Health, Gender, Households, Strategies, Communication?
In the research report Perceptions of Influence that had a focus on how households make health decisions, one of the significant implications from that research read as follows:
We would very much welcome you sharing (a) your reation to that proposed priority (b) any initiatives in which you have been engaged that have a focus on greater gender equity in the ways in which households make health decisions and (c) your critique of that work relative to improving health status. With many thanks for engaging on this important issue.
Comments
Casas Maternas in the Rural Highlands of Guatemala:
This is a quick follow up to the Health, Gender, Households, Strategies, Communication? post that drew as its starting point the Nigeria research on how househoulds and communities make health decisions.
Research from Guatemala reveals a similar dynamic with a communication focused programmatic response that seems to have had real impact. The programme is Casas Maternas in the Rural Highlands of Guatemala. They were up against a maternal mortality ratio (MMR) of 338 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births with (2011) 89% of deliveries were still occurring in the homes, and 81% were attended by traditional birth attendants (comadronas). By 2014, 54% of women living in the Calhuitz and Santo Domingo partner communities were giving birth at the respective Casas Maternas.
How this happened is a complex story. The The researchers attribute community engagement and community ownership as being critical for establishing the operation of the Casas Maternas (construction and management of the facility) and to the success of the Curamericas programme.
What is your critical review of the strategy being implemented?
How compelling and "solid" are the research results in your opinion?
Many thanks for engaging on the vitally important issues related to maternal mortality.
- Inicie sesión para enviar comentarios